“Gnome Hunters”: Understanding Skeptical Views of Paranormal Investigation

 

Yes, I called you “You People” as though you slaughter puppies and I want to emphasize the difference between us and ensure none of the puppy blood gets on my person. I don’t really think that way, but it made ya mad, didn’t it? I should re-title this piece “Manipulative Skeptic Gets The Final Ha-Ha.”

No, honestly, I was asked to write an article about how skeptics view people involved in the paranormal field. Of course, I don’t really know the answer to that. I don’t know all skeptics, and it’s not as though when we’re hanging out together we clink our beers together and mutter something about those idiot ghost hunters. And, quite frankly, I am involved in the paranormal field. I have been ghost hunting. I have had psychic readings. I have (dare I say it) analyzed my dreams.

So really, the – let’s call them ‘paranormalists’ – and I are not very different. We have the same information and… well, normally I would say “have come to different conclusions,” but that’s sort of the difference between skeptics and the perceived concept of skeptics. I viewed the same information and came to no conclusion at all. There is only information.

Since there is no real difference between us, instead of talking about “you people” in this article, I’m going to give you an example and ask you to honestly think about what would run through your head if you were confronted by it.

One day, you are hanging out in a book store. You bump into a man who is buying some books, and wind up talking to him for a while. You find out that the man has a hobby – every time he visits a new place, he scans the area with a special Gnome Finder that he has designed himself. In reality, the Gnome Finder is a calculator. When the man finds out about a place that is rumored to be full of gnomes (which are, of course, invisible), the man takes his calculator/Gnome Finder to the location and puts in a simple math problem; like 2+2. Every time the man gets a wrong answer, he knows that gnomes are around because gnomes hate math and they block all right answers to illustrate that fact.

The man ignores all other possible explanations for the wrong answer; like perhaps his finger slipped on the button or the batteries in the calculator were low. He knows there are gnomes because texts dating back to ancient times have reports of them, and because there are so many reports still. He even, when he was a child, saw a gnome, and that experience has stayed with him ever since.

You abruptly begin backing away because the man is clearly insane.

Let’s examine this example a little more closely.

The man believes in something you have never personally seen, and for which there is no scientific evidence. The man uses equipment to gauge whether or not this thing you have never seen is present in a location even though it is not designed for the purpose, is not accurate, and has never been shown to do anything beyond one particular thing, which is not searching for gnomes. The man does not account for other possibilities for his anomalous readings. The man depends upon the mythology of a civilization for proof. The man also depends on a memory from when he was a young child, despite evidence that childhood memories are unreliable.

Let me know when that sounds familiar.

Assume you keep talking to this man because you have no regard for your own safety.

You bring up the points in the above paragraph. To each of these points, the man has a response. He says that it doesn’t matter if you personally have not seen gnomes. He has. And yes, it was when he was a child, but obviously that just means children are more open to the possibility that gnomes exist, and that the rules that are hammered into us in school have made adults blind to the presence of gnomes. The man says that it doesn’t matter what the calculator was designed to do – he has evidence, from his many gnome hunting expeditions, that there is a correlation between wrong readings and reports of gnome activity. And the man insists that he does account for other possibilities for the readings because he changes his batteries often and is very careful when putting in the numbers. And anyway, the man can prove it. He has photos.

You ask to see the photos of the gnomes. The man presents you with a series of photographs from different locations. Some of the photos look like smoke. Some look like lens flares. Some look like motion blurs. Some look like bugs caught in the flash of the camera.

You point this out, and the man tells you that he is sure no one in the photos was ever smoking. He knows how to photograph things because he has taken a photography course, so they aren’t lens flares. He would know what those looked like. No one in the photos was in motion, and neither was the camera. There were no bugs out that night because it was winter.

And anyway, that’s alright, he has audio too.

You ask to hear the audio, and the man pulls a voice recorder from his pocket. He plays you an audio clip. It is full of static. You hear something that might be a voice, but you aren’t really sure because the quality is kind of poor, and there is no context for the clip – it starts up right in the middle of what the man refers to as Gnome Voice Phenomenon, or GVP. If you think about it, it does sort of sound like a voice in the same way that if you drag a chair across the floor it might sound similar to a human voice if it was played back through a voice recorder, which is designed to filter audio in search of patterns like human voices. If you think about it, the sound could almost practically be saying “Paul is dead,” or “Cranberry sauce,” or “Toaster pastry.”

The man tells you it says “I am Gnome.”

You ask to hear the recording again, and he plays it back to you, this time with you listening specifically for a sound that is close to “I am Gnome.” And, after he plays it again, you can sort of hear it that way. You know, however, that humans search for patterns in noise, and that if someone tells you specifically what pattern to look for, you’ll be able to find it. In fact, you have tested this phenomenon at home by recording the sound of a glass being scooted across the surface of a table and later telling your good friend that it was a secret special recording of Marilyn Monroe, and he could swear he heard part of the happy birthday song in it. And even if it really is a voice, and even if it really is saying “I am Gnome” in some of the most garbled language you’ve ever heard, you can’t see anything. Audio is only audio. Even if the voice was perfectly clear, there could be a human being standing right next to the recorder saying it.

You point this out, and the man tells you there absolutely was not anyone doing any such thing.

In fact, he has a television show on the Sci-Fi Network on Wednesdays at 9/8 Central with the rest of his group, called GAPS (Gnome Activity Pursuing Society). You go home, glad to be rid of the man in the bookstore. Luckily, it is Wednesday, so you sit down and turn on the Sci-Fi channel and watch the show.

The show contains everything you feared. A group of individuals walking around, searching for gnomes with equipment that doesn’t actually prove anything about gnomes. A series of anomalous calculator readings that don’t illustrate anything at all. The group says that they are skeptical, but they sure as heck aren’t called “We Are Going To Go Figure Out Whether Or Not There Is Something Society.” They are GAPS. They even have t-shirts.

At one point in the show, something passes in front of the camera. It looks like it might be mist. The GAPS team is very excited about this, as gnomes are known to appear in a mist-like form. They run around for a few minutes, trying to capture more mist. They also try to replicate the mist. They cannot replicate the mist. It must be real Gnome-Mist. Of course, you realize from your seat at home that this means nothing except that there is no more mist around, but GAPS disagrees.

They never actually call the location “Gnomed,” but many of the members argue about whether or not it is. There is one, who you assume is always the hard-sell, who is very against using the word “Gnomed” at all. He prefers the term “anomalous activity.” Then he calls himself a skeptic, even though the logo on his web site contains, you guessed it, a gnome, and his show is called Gnome Hunters (GH for short).

You still aren’t really sure what the mist was, so you get online on your computer. You discover two things:

1. GAPS has a giant fanbase.
2. There are groups out there that have replicated the mist you saw in the episode.

After all this, do you believe in gnomes?

I am a skeptic. When confronted with all this information, I would say that the evidence didn’t support the existence of gnomes. It might be possible that they exist, and that I am just wrong. Perhaps one day there will be concrete evidence of the existence of gnomes, but as of yet, I don’t see it. I haven’t drawn a conclusion. I am not against people who say there are gnomes. I do not think they are all idiots or crazy. I cannot judge their claims because I wasn’t there. The only ones I can be present for are ones that are shown on the Gnome Hunters television show, which are inconclusive, edited, and short. And, of course, GAPS has a vested interest in making people believe that gnomes exist – their ratings depend upon it.

I cannot answer for all skeptics. Maybe there are ones out there who actively disbelieve in gnomes. Or ghosts. Or whatever. I would say that forming a definite opinion isn’t very skeptical. Often, I have heard people say that skeptics don’t have open minds. But they actually have the most open minds of all – anything is always possible, and we’re just waiting for the evidence to roll in.

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

What People in Houston are Reading
?

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at info@content.ad.

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More